Category: Opinion & Analysis

  • Sabhuku deals: Hazards of selling communal land

    The large billboard near Goromonzi High School, Mashonaland East, carries a stark warning: it is illegal to sell and buy land under the Communal Lands Act.

    Yet 40km east of Harare, this prohibition is routinely ignored as ultra-modern brick houses compete cheek by jowl with simple rural dwellings in an uneasy landscape of legal contradiction.

    Goromonzi communal lands present a district in transition — neither fully urban nor rural.

    Fancy suburban houses sit haphazardly between village thatched huts and tiny farm-brick houses, creating an awkward settlement pattern with no coherent planning. Mashona cows, goats, vehicles and humans mingle along dusty footpaths in a scene replicated across Seke, Domboshava, and other communal areas surrounding Harare.

    This transformation stems from a thriving illegal land market. Original occupants hive off family and ancestral lands, selling to land seekers attracted by ease of purchase, cheap prices, proximity to Harare, and fertile soils.

    The buyers range from local Zimbabweans to foreigners willing to pay “a few thousand US dollars” to village heads and chiefs.

    How Sabhuku deals work

    These transactions follow no scientific or legal standards.

    Land measurement relies on crude foot-stride counting methods unchanged since 367 BC.

    Parties may or may not enter written agreements, but typically the process involves payment to the seller, introduction to the village head and additional payment, and declaration of kinship ties.

    The declaration is often fabricated, allowing foreigners to become closely related to the local people. There is optional registration with the chief, depending on local protocols.

    No title deeds or valid cessions are possible since all transactions violate the Communal Lands Act, which restricts communal land to kinship-based allocation.

    Under Section 8, communal land cannot be sold, and occupancy rights cannot be ceded without proper authority.

    The illegal sales breach multiple statutory provisions as follows:

    Communal Lands Act

    Section 3 vests communal land in the President, while Section 8 prohibits sales and unauthorised transfers. Only the Rural District Council, after consultation with traditional leaders, can allocate land rights.

    Traditional Leaders Act

    Chiefs and headmen lack authority to authorise land sales, though they may facilitate proper allocation procedures.

    Regional Town and Country Planning Act

    The haphazard settlements violate planning laws, creating future infrastructure nightmares.

    Despite these clear prohibitions, enforcement remains minimal, with the Government appearing to turn blind eyes to the practice.

    Immediate appeal vs long-term consequences

    Superficially, these arrangements appear beneficial—willing buyer meets willing seller for unused land.

    Many plots belong to deceased relatives, emigrants, or daughters who married and moved away, making sales seem logical rather than letting land lie idle.

    For buyers, particularly those who could never otherwise own land, these transactions provide homeownership without administrative costs and bureaucratic hurdles that plague formal land acquisition.

    However, this market creates serious long-term problems such as erosion of traditional security.

    Rural homes have historically served as social security for Zimbabwe’s black population—a guaranteed fallback during crisis, retirement, or urban economic difficulties.

    This safety net is being permanently sold away.

    There is also the prospect of future homelessness as communal land becomes scarce and traditional support systems collapse; urban homelessness may increase dramatically.

    Also, social fragmentation as diverse communities with no traditional ties or common interests compete for limited resources, creating potential for conflict and rural crime. There are also planning disasters: Haphazard settlement without infrastructure planning creates future nightmares for service delivery and development

    The Government faces a complex challenge.

    Strict enforcement would displease thousands of current occupants and create humanitarian crises. Yet continued tolerance undermines the rule of law and threatens Zimbabwe’s traditional land tenure system.

    The phenomenon reflects deeper failures in formal land delivery systems. Where legal mechanisms fail to meet genuine housing needs, illegal markets emerge to fill the void.

    Rather than continued prohibition without enforcement, Zimbabwe needs legislative reform to amend communal land legislation to create regulated markets that protect traditional rights while allowing controlled transfers.

    There should be regularisation programmes and policies that develop mechanisms to legitimise existing settlements through proper planning and infrastructure provision.

    Institutional coordination is also needed to strengthen partnerships between rural district councils, traditional leaders, and central government to manage land allocation transparently.

    Also, community education, which deploys paralegals and extension officers to educate communities about legal implications before transactions occur, should be fostered.

    Lastly, alternative land delivery accelerates formal residential land systems and reduce pressure on communal areas.

    The illegal communal land market represents rational responses to genuine needs within a dysfunctional formal system.

    However, the current laissez-faire approach risks destroying traditional safety nets while creating future social problems. Policymakers must move beyond prohibition to pragmatic regulation that balances individual needs with collective security.

    The billboard’s warning in Goromonzi remains relevant, but only if backed by viable legal alternatives and consistent enforcement.

    Without urgent intervention, Zimbabwe risks losing both the rule of law and the traditional land tenure system that has provided security for generations. The time for honest discussion about communal land reform has arrived.

    This article was taken from The Herald. Miriam Tose Majome is a lawyer and a Commissioner with the Zimbabwe Media Commission. She writes in her personal capacity and can be contacted on mtmajome@gmail.com

  • Why PVC Ceiling Boards Are Becoming the Smart Choice for Modern Homes and Offices

    In Zimbabwe’s ever-changing construction landscape, the choice of ceiling material has become more than just an afterthought. It is a decision that affects durability, aesthetics, cost, and even maintenance. Two contenders dominate this space: polyvinyl chloride (PVC) ceiling boards and gypsum-based rhino boards. Both have their supporters, but which one is best suited to our local climate, economy, and lifestyle?

    Durability: The Battle Against Heat and Moisture
    Zimbabwe’s climate is no friend to weak building materials. Between the blazing summer heat and high humidity during the rainy season, ceilings are put to the test. PVC ceiling boards score highly in this regard. They are waterproof, termite-proof, and do not warp when exposed to moisture. For bathrooms, kitchens, and low-ventilation spaces, PVC is a clear winner.

    Rhino boards, on the other hand, perform well in stable indoor environments but are vulnerable to water damage. A leaking roof can cause them to bubble, stain, or crumble. While rhino boards hold up reasonably well in living rooms and bedrooms, they require careful maintenance in moisture-prone areas.

    Aesthetics: Style Versus Sophistication
    For homeowners chasing style, PVC ceiling boards provide a wide array of finishes, from glossy wood-like designs to modern 3D textures. They offer flexibility for those who want ceilings that double as decorative features.

    Rhino boards are less flashy but lend themselves to a classic, smooth, and professional look once painted. They create the clean, flat finish favored in offices and upmarket homes. In fact, many high-end properties in Harare and Bulawayo still rely on rhino boards because of the premium feel they deliver when properly installed and finished with paint.

    Maintenance: A Question of Effort
    PVC wins the low-maintenance contest hands down. A simple wipe with a damp cloth is enough to keep it looking fresh, which is ideal for busy households. Paint is never required.

    Rhino boards, however, need regular painting to maintain their appearance. Cracks and stains may also require patching and touch-ups. This means higher long-term maintenance costs, although some Zimbabweans still prefer rhino boards precisely because repainting allows for changing ceiling colors to suit new décor.

    Cost: Upfront Versus Long-Term
    PVC ceiling boards are generally more affordable in Zimbabwe, both in terms of purchase and installation. They can be installed quickly, which reduces labor costs. The long-term savings are also significant since repainting and frequent repairs are unnecessary.

    Rhino boards tend to be more expensive upfront and require professional installation for a flawless finish. Their maintenance costs over time add up, making them less budget-friendly for households watching their expenses. Still, for those investing in luxury properties, the higher cost is sometimes justified by the sleek outcome.

    Eco-Friendliness and Safety
    Rhino boards, being gypsum-based, are considered more environmentally friendly and naturally fire-resistant. For homeowners prioritizing eco-conscious choices, rhino boards carry an advantage.

    PVC boards are recyclable, but critics argue they are less eco-friendly during production. However, high-quality PVC boards sold in Zimbabwe today are usually fire-retardant, offering safety for households.

    Who Should Choose What?
    For urban families dealing with rising living costs, PVC ceiling boards provide the best value. They are affordable, stylish, and easy to maintain, making them practical for high-traffic, moisture-prone, or modestly budgeted homes.

    Rhino boards, meanwhile, remain the choice for prestige projects, especially in spaces where elegance and a seamless finish matter more than maintenance. Offices, hotels, and high-end suburban homes often opt for rhino boards for their sophisticated look, despite the higher cost and upkeep.

    Final Word
    Neither PVC nor rhino boards are universally “better.” The choice depends on your budget, lifestyle, and design priorities. PVC boards shine in durability, cost-effectiveness, and variety, while rhino boards excel in premium finishes and eco-friendliness. For Zimbabweans navigating tight budgets but demanding long-term value, PVC makes more sense. For those building showcase homes or corporate spaces, rhino boards still hold their own.

    At the end of the day, the ceiling above your head should not only shelter but also reflect your priorities. In Zimbabwe, where climate, cost, and style all play a role, the smart choice is the one that balances practicality with vision.